Yatra taking over rival Travelguru The Travelguru acquisition will make Yatra a dominant player in domestic hotel bookings

Yatra Online Pvt. Ltd is taking over rival travel and hotel booking site Travelguru.com by acquiring the stake of US-based travel agency Travelocity.com LP in the Mumbai-based company, according to two executives close to the development.
Details about the value of the transaction weren’t immediately available. Officials of both Yatra and Travelguru didn’t respond to phone calls and messages. Travelocity’s representatives couldn’t immediately be reached for comment. Speculation about the acquisition was doing the rounds of various websites on Friday.The Travelguru acquisition will make Yatra a dominant player in domestic hotel bookings, a Yatra executive and analysts said. This extension is becoming critical as margins dwindle in the ticketing segment, given stiff competition from rivals such as Makemytrip.com and Cleartrip.com. “The decision has to be purely about the hotel business,” said Chetan Kapoor, an analyst at travel industry research company PhoCusWright. “Online travel agencies (OTAs) have been centered around airlines since a long time. But now, air ticketing is not that profitable with current commissions. The online travel companies make a profit of around 1-2% from air ticketing, whereas the hotel business gives them 15-30% margin.”
According to information on its website, Yatra is backed by Promod Haque’s Silicon Valley-based Norwest Venture Partners (NVP), Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group’s Reliance Venture Asset Management Ltd, Raghav Bahl-promoted Television 18 Group, and Intel Capital, the strategic investment arm of Intel. Travelguru is led by Ashwin Damera, chief executive and co-founder, and Ganesh Rengaswamy, co-founder, according to its website.
Travelocity, a part of Texas-based travel marketing and distribution company Sabre Holdings Corp., bought Travelguru.com in 2009 with the aim of expanding its reach in the domestic hotel industry.
“It’s not clear why Travelocity would want to unload Travelguru from its portfolio as they acquired it mainly because of its reach in domestic hotel business,” Kapoor said. “It seems like a profitable deal for Yatra, which will now have a huge domestic hotel inventory, because this is where the profit is.”

China pips Apple on iPhone 5 launch The hotly anticipated iPhone 5 is widely expected to be released sometime between August and October this year

Apple Inc’s next-generation iPhone has not even been released yet, but opportunistic sellers on China’s largest e-commerce platform, Taobao, are already accepting pre-orders, complete with mock-up pictures and purported technical specifications.
The hotly anticipated iPhone 5 is widely expected to be released sometime between August and October this year, although Apple itself has been tight-lipped about it. Sources have said the iPhone 5 would have a bigger screen than previous models, while Taiwanese media reported the phone’s voice recognition software, Siri, would have more powerful functions.
Sellers on Taobao, a unit of Alibaba Group, are accepting orders for the iPhone 5, in some cases asking for a deposit of 1,000 yuan for the new phone. One seller, “Dahai99888”, who started accepting pre-orders this week, is asking for full payment upfront, at a cool 6,999 yuan.Taobao sellers that the news agency spoke with said they planned to buy the iPhone 5 in Hong Kong or the United States and then bring it to mainland China. Apple products are often available in Hong Kong before they are released on the mainland.
The sellers could not promise a specific delivery time.
The pre-order activity comes despite the mystery around the iPhone 5 and highlights the intense demand for new Apple products in China.
Apple has not confirmed the specifications, details or price of the latest iPhone, but the Internet rumour mill has been in overdrive, churning out photo renderings and pictures of purported iPhone 5 engineering samples and speculating endlessly on its technical specifications and functions.
Apple did not respond to requests for comment.
“Demand is high. Yesterday someone just bought two phones. Altogether we have about two dozen orders,” said one seller on Taobao who went by the nickname Xiaoyu.
On Alibaba.com, the business-to-consumer platform of Alibaba Group, hard-shell cases and soft silicone cases for the iPhone 5 were peddled by sellers, most located in southern China. The majority of cases indicate an elongated iPhone 5 with some showing an earphone jack located at the bottom. One verified Alibaba.com seller Reuters spoke to “guaranteed” the cases were accurate, saying the company’s boss received the dimensions from “certain channels”.
Although it is hard to know whether the cases on Alibaba.com reflect the real deal, the sellers have been right before. In early 2011, cases for the yet-to-be-launch iPad 2 appeared on Alibaba.com, showing accurately the placement for a rear-facing camera.
Demand for Apple products in China is so high that many consumers buy smuggled goods in order get them before the official China release. Earlier this year scalpers queued overnight outside a Beijing store for the latest version of the iPhone 4, only to pelt the store with eggs after Apple decided against selling the phone there because of security concerns.
“It’s not so easy to bring the phones from overseas, there’s a limit to how many you can carry in...If we could bring in a few thousand that will be great!,” said Xiaoyu.
One enterprising seller posted a list of 17 possible new iPhone 5 features and gave a percentage probability that they would be included in the new device. For example, a biometric capability has a 20% chance of being a feature on the iPhone 5, according to the seller.
Apple, which recently settled an iPad trademark lawsuit with a Shenzhen technology firm, said on Tuesday it would release its latest iPad in China on July 20.
Apple has five stores in mainland China and plans to open flagship stores in the major Chinese cities of Chengdu and Shenzhen, according to government officials.

Indian entrepreneurs could do with some nurturing too Indian entrepreneurs have made their mark in the Internet space through examples such as InfoEdge, Flipkart and Makemytrip

Jeff Bezos launched Amazon in 1998, which created the phenomena called e-commerce on the Internet. Its market capitalization is about $98 billion now and Bezos is an inspiration to many wannabe Internet entrepreneurs around the world. Ma Yun “Jack” launched Alibaba in 1999, which had features similar to that of Amazon, popularizing e-commerce in China. After listing and delisting (probably for relisting at higher valuation) it is estimated to be valued at $35-50 billion.
Shyamal Banerjee/Mint
Shyamal Banerjee/Mint
Yahoo was founded in 1995 by Jerry Yang and David Filo to organize search on the Web. (Yahoo is an acronym for “yet another hierarchical officious oracle”). Yahoo is today valued at $19 billion after dropping by at least 80% from an all-time high in 2000. Ma Huateng and Zhang Zhidong launched a portal called Ten Cent in November 1998. It provides net, mobile VAS and instant messaging services in China and is valued at above $54 billion. It is the third largest Internet company in the world after Google and Amazon.Mark Elliot Zuckerberg launched Facebook in February 2004. It became a great success in no time and created social networking on the Internet. Notwithstanding a fall in price on listing post its initial public offer (IPO), Facebook is currently valued at $74 billion making Zuckerberg one of the youngest billionaires. Joseph Chen launched Renren in February 2005 targeted at the Chinese market for social networking. Today it has a market capitalization of $1.7 billion after falling about 76% from its high in May 2011. This fall has probably occurred on investor disappointment on the pre-IPO statement of 160 million registered users versus post-IPO statement of 31 million active monthly users.
Larry Page and Sergey Brin conceptualized an efficient search engine in 1996 while studying and launched Google in 1999. It became a default search engine for the whole world except China. It is currently valued at $189 billion making Page and Brin poster boys of Internet billionaires. Robin Li and Eric Xu launched Baidu (which looks very similar to Google) in January 2000 targeted at the Chinese market. Today it is dominant in China with a market capitalization of $38 billion. Founders Robin Li and Eric Xu have become role model for Chinese entrepreneurs.
Jack Dorsey and Evan Williams launched Twitter in March 2006. It pioneered the concept of micro-blogging. Its valuation estimate ranges from $3 billion to $8 billion. Charles Chao of Sina Corp. launched a micro-blogging site, Sina Weibo, in August 2009 targeted at the Chinese market. It comprises features of Facebook and Twitter. Today it is more popular than all the other micro-blogging sites in China and is valued at more than $3.1 billion.
William Deng created Net ease in June 1997 for multiplayer online gaming and is today valued at $7.5 billion. Youku established by Wingcheung Koo “Victor” has similar features to YouTube and is estimated to be worth about $2.4 billion. At the end of the first quarter of calendar year 2012, Internet user business in China is estimated at $513 million and in India at $121 million, according to Internetworldstats.com.
India has the third largest Internet using population in the world after China and the US. In a few years, India will overtake the US in terms of number of Internet users. Over the next few years, it is likely that India will become the fastest growing Internet market in the world. Despite the size of the Indian Internet market, there are no Jack Ma, Ma Huateng or Robin Li equivalent entrepreneurs in India. It is difficult to find Indian Ranran, Net Ease, Sina Weibo, Baidu, Alibaba or Ten Cent.
Why is it that China has created the Chinese version of Google, Yahoo, Facebook, YouTube, Amazon and Twitter? More importantly, these companies are primarily owned by Chinese entrepreneurs and investors. Wealth created from the Internet boom in China is largely contained in China for the benefits of the Chinese. The number of subscribers, size of the country, language barrier, ease of doing business, among other things, can’t differentiate the gap between China and India in creating copies of successful global Internet companies. If at all, India is a difficult market to do business than China in the perception of most investors.
Indian entrepreneurs have made their mark in the Internet space through examples such as InfoEdge, Flipkart and Makemytrip. However, the size and the scale of Chinese companies are missing here.
It is likely that China has not heard the phrase atithi devo bhava (a visitor is like a god). They have guarded their territory for local entrepreneurs through sam, dam, dund and bhed (influence, money, stick and divide and rule). Global Internet firms have been restricted from free access to the vast Chinese market with scant respect for intellectual property rights.
China has provided nurturing from their point of view and undue protection from the global point of view to Chinese entrepreneurs to reap the reward of Internet boom. It’s not, too, late for India even today to formulate a policy that nurtures and encourages local entrepreneurs to reach the size and scale suitable to the Indian market and create wealth for Indians through the Internet boom. Asset price inflation has raised the bar for first-generation entrepreneurs. Give them the encouragement, which they truly deserve, to conquer the virtual world.

Stock options back in vogue as funding rounds boost valuations Employees of firms such as Just Dial and One97 have reaped substantial rewards through stock options

InfosysLtd, India’s second largest software exporter, was among the technology companies that rewarded staff with employee stock options, or Esops, which turned some of them into millionaires (although the company’s options programme was short-lived). At the other end of the spectrum, the dotcom era also spawned hundreds of companies that gave away stock options, only to leave employees with penny stocks when they shut down.
File Photo
File Photo
With e-commerce and mobile technology markets active over the last few years, wealth creation through stock options appears to have once again caught the fancy of employees with further rounds of funding boosting company valuations.For instance, late last month when Mumbai-based listings provider, Just Dial Ltd, raised Rs. 327 crore from venture capital (VC) investors Sequoia Capitaland SAP Ventures, the funding not only left the company flush with cash but also made around 50 of its 6,000 employees very rich.
Watch Video
E-commerce and mobile technology firms are handing out employee stock options. But does that really mean a new wave of instant millionaires? Mint’s Deepti Chanudhary tells us.

These employees have encashed their stock options through secondaries, or selling shares to another investor, in various funding rounds. Founded in 1996, the unlisted Just Dial has had five fund-raising rounds, with its valuation going up each time.
“We have over 40 crorepatis and nearly 10 dollar millionaires in our company. Investors can buy options from our employees. We don’t have a problem with that,” said V.S.S. Mani, Just Dial’s founder and chief executive, adding that the promoters and employees of Just Dial hold a 40% stake in the company.
Mani said stock options are not offered to more than 10% of the employees. Who gets what depends on performance and tenure, with the employee needing to have served at least two years.
Just Dial plans to file a draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) next month with the aim of going public in 2013. “With our IPO (initial public offer) next year, our employees will hit a pot of gold,” Mani said.
Similarly, unlisted One97 Communications Ltdhas at least three employees who have reaped substantial rewards through stock options.
Acceptance of Esops will depend on examples where people can see the creation of wealth due to stock options, said Vijay Shekhar Sharma, founder and managing director of One97 Communications, adding that his company’s IPO will create more than 10 crorepatis or people with Rs. 1 crore or more. “In India, Esops are not talked about much,” Sharma said.
Stock options represent a deferred compensation plan for companies, so the cash outflow is restricted and takes the form of equity.
For the employee, they are an opportunity to make so-called supernormal earnings by participating in the company’s overall growth rather than just drawing a salary based on the industry’s compensation standards.
Options are offered at a pre-determined price and have vesting schedules. The options vesting and exercise schedule differs from company to company.
Once the stock options are vested and exercised (which can be simultaneous), the employee becomes a shareholder in the company. The price of the option is fixed on the offer date.
Not everyone with stocks options in a highly valued company would have got cash in hand. While companies such as Just Dial, Flipkart, One97 and InMobihave rewarded employees with options, those who haven’t encashed them remain rich on paper.
For instance, Flipkart, which has raised at least four rounds of funding and is India’s largest and best-funded e-commerce company, has at least 50 employees whose stock options have earned them at least Rs. 1 crore if not more. Most of this remains on paper as employees anticipate a further rise in value as the company expands.
“Our employees feel the company is growing and will continue to grow in years to come,” said Binny Bansal, chief operating officer and co-founder of Flipkart.
Bangalore-headquartered InMobi, the world’s largest independent mobile ad network, has 25-40 “very wealthy” employees on “paper”.
“An IPO or any liquidation event will make these employees very rich. The money is not in hand right now. We have not seen any secondaries happening,” said Monisha Tambay, vice-president, global people operations, InMobi.
Staff need to make sure their interests are protected by, for instance, paying close to the fine print on the option.
“Employees need to ensure that the vesting schedule is accelerated, so that they can exercise the options and become shareholders. They need to ensure that their rights are spelled out clearly,” said Akil Hirani, managing partner, Majmudar and Partners.
Also, stock options can be a wealth-creation tool only if the company is attractive to investors. Without investor interest, the company won’t be able to go public or get strategic partners, rendering options worthless.
“If a company fails to have an IPO or M&A (mergers and acquisitions) event, the stock options may not yield much value,” said Hirani. “There could be options like buying back of stock options, but they can be bought only if they are vested.”
Given the uncertainty over how a company could fare over several years, employees are more comfortable with the cash component of salary being increased since stock prices can fluctuate.
At one company that went public a few years ago, the stock is trading at nearly half the price at which options were initially offered to an employee.
“I have refused to buy the last 25% tranche that I was supposed to get now,” said the employee on condition of anonymity.

With 4G launch, RIL plans to kill many birds with one stone In terms of sheer ambition, though, the 4G project has the trademarks of the typical Ambani initiative

Reliance Industries Ltd’s (RIL’s) much-anticipated launch of wireless broadband, or the so-called fourth-generation (4G) services, is scheduled for early 2013 in New Delhi and Mumbai, according to one of the company’s executives who did not want to be identified, given the secrecy associated with the project.
Indeed, work on the project is, at least from the outside, progressing much more quietly than it did on two other launches overseen by chairman Mukesh Ambani and his close associate and colleague Manoj Modi—those of the company’s telecom operations in December 2002, and retail business in 2006.
In terms of sheer ambition, though, the 4G project has the trademarks of the typical Ambani initiative.
“In the first two years, we will cover 50 metros and all of India by the fourth year,” said the executive. “Various demos are on as we speak.”
Big plans: RIL chairman Mukesh Ambani says the company’s digital services will revolutionize the lives of millions of Indians by giving them access and opportunities. Prashant Nadkar/Fotocorp
Big plans: RIL chairman Mukesh Ambani says the company’s digital services will revolutionize the lives of millions of Indians by giving them access and opportunities. Prashant Nadkar/Fotocorp
An email sent to the company on 26 June seeking comment for this story elicited no response. The project itself would have been in the works for a little over 30 months by the time of launch.
In June 2010, RIL bought out the only winner of wireless spectrum across India, Infotel Broadband Services Ltd, for Rs. 4,800 crore (around $1 billion then) and its total planned investment in the new business was touted to be around $5 billion.
“Our digital services business will revolutionize the lives of millions of Indians by giving them access and opportunities,” Ambani emphatically stated at the company’s annual general meeting (AGM) on 7 June. “We plan to provide an ever growing range of digital services in key domains of national interest such as education, healthcare, security, financial services, government-citizen interfaces and entertainment.”
Ensuring that this happens is Modi, who spearheads the oil-to-yarn conglomerate’s new consumer-focused businesses such as telecom and retail. He oversees a team of “around 700 employees based out of Mumbai and a few units in other cities” who are working on the 4G project, said the executive mentioned above.
But the dream remains that of Ambani, who led the erstwhile undivided RIL’s entry into telecom with Reliance Infocomm Ltd. In December 2002, Reliance Infocomm launched its telecom services with free mobile handsets and low call rates, transforming the industry and kick-starting a mobile telephony boom that lasted till the end of the decade.
A subsequent family feud saw the Reliance empire being carved up between Mukesh Ambani and his younger brother Anil Ambani in 2005; telecom went to the latter. Mukesh Ambani, however, continued to harbour ambitions of creating a new telecom venture that would “revolutionize lives”.
At the core of the RIL strategy is content and the company would appear to have learned from the experience of telcos offering 3G services; 3G has seen poor response in India and the RIL executive said this is because of a shortage of innovative content and value-added services. He attributes this to the way telcos split revenue with content and application creators—around 70% goes to the telco, 15% to the content aggregator and the rest to the content creator.
RIL, this person added, would not work with aggregators and share as much as 50% of revenue with content creators so as to encourage them to create even better content. Almost 70% of the content that RIL will deliver, this executive said, would be videos—video-on demand, live videos, and “catch-up TV”. And the company will do this across languages and genres.
Gaining the edge
It is here that RIL’s recent investments in television companies such as Network18 Media and Investments Ltd will help. In return for the investment made by it in the Network18 group through a multi-layered transaction, RIL will gain access to the media house’s news and entertainment content across websites, television channels and print, which it can disseminate through its 4G network.
“RIL is on a winning wicket since it will be the only national 4G platform provider,” says Jehil Thakkar, head of the media and entertainment vertical at audit and consulting firm KPMG. “A large part of the data usage is driven by media and entertainment, and the investment in Network18 gives RIL the right edge to get started.”
Education is another area of focus. In November, Infotel Broadband, through an “affiliate” Reliance Strategic Investments Ltd, acquired a 38.5% stake in an online tutoring company, Extramarks Education Pvt. Ltd. At the time, the company said in a press release that the acquisition was done keeping in mind its digital distribution model.
Both entertainment and education were part of Ambani’s so-called triple-play strategy for Reliance Infocomm when it launched. The centrepiece, of course, was voice. That may not be the case this time around, at least in the beginning.
The 4G technology that RIL is planning to adopt, TD-LTE (Time Division-Long Term Evolution), was developed primarily for high-speed wireless data services and is considered inefficient for voice services. “They need back-up spectrum specifically meant for voice to be able to provide voice. They may be able to provide some voice services through apps such as Skype and Viber or VoIP (voice over Internet protocol) if the handsets allow it,” said a Mumbai-based analyst at a multinational investment banking firm, who asked not to be identified.
On 31 May, the Union cabinet approved the National Telecom Policy (NTP) 2012, a document that sets out goals and objectives for the sector in the next 10 years. NTP 2012 allows almost universal VoIP, a change that is expected to directly benefit RIL. Currently, Indian laws only allow VoIP calls to a telephone in India under strict conditions. They allow such calls between computers within the country’s borders and between a computer in India and a telephone (fixed or wireless) outside India.
But voice is no longer a lucrative stream of business.
“We don’t see significant risks from VoIP, given little progress elsewhere globally. In addition, voice tariffs are the lowest in India, limiting the scope for VoIP to compete on price,” Rajiv Sharma, an analyst with HSBC Securities and Capital Markets (India) Pvt. Ltd, wrote in a 23 April report. “LTE handsets don’t support voice today, which will be essential in the Indian context in our view.”
Such reasoning may explain why the minority view among analysts is that RIL will launch 4G services with voice as one of the offerings and the majority view is that it will acquire a telco.
In 2002, RIL had also planned to make its platform an open one and encourage developers and others to create applications for it, taking a leaf out of the strategy of Japanese telco NTT DoCoMo Inc.
Things didn’t really work to script back then, but RIL is convinced it will with its 4G operations.
“Our platform will be an open one,” the RIL executive said. “We wish to encourage product brands to set up applications for their customers. Dedicated applications for tablets and smartphones will be created.”
Taking retail online
And much like in the plan it had in 2002, RIL hopes for some e-commerce play, too; it helps that it has already entered the modern retail business. Indeed, the company gave a hint of its desire to take its retail business digital when its 2011-12 annual report said: “Reliance Retail (Ltd) seeks to add alternative channels to reach out to customers. These channels will provide convenience of any time, anywhere shopping with an access to wide variety of products.”
Ambani singled out retail as one of the future “engines of growth” for RIL at the company’s 2011-12 AGM on 7 June, saying revenue from the business will grow six times in the next three-four years to reach Rs. 40,000-50,000 crore.
Bijou Kurien, president and chief executive of Reliance Retail’s lifestyle business segment, said on the sidelines of a conference in May that e-commerce would be a part of the multi-channel strategy of the conglomerate’s retail arm, and become large and sustainable over a period.
“We have various customers across our retail formats catering to retail and institutional customers,” a Reliance Retail executive said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “We will try and develop alternative shopping channels for them where orders can be taken and deliveries made any time and anywhere.” This person added that “broadband wireless will obviously bring in new avenues, thanks to the high speed that it will offer”.
RIL appears to be looking at international success stories in this area. Three RIL executives, including the aforementioned Reliance Retail official, cited the example of Tesco Plc’s virtual store format in South Korea that was launched in March when queried on retail models possible with 4G.
Tesco Homeplus, the UK-based retailer’s South Korean arm, opened the world’s first virtual store in a subway station in Seoul to help commuters shop using their smartphones while on the move. The search for suitable business models seems to suggest that RIL will do more than just launch an e-commerce website.
“Our e-commerce model will not be plain vanilla,” the Reliance Retail executive said.
According to a November 2011 report by Avendus Capital Pvt. Ltd on the digital consumer industry, e-retailing is set to become a Rs. 53,000 crore market by 2015 from the current Rs. 3,600 crore.
Ashish Bhide, head of digital media and technology at Avendus Capital, said that e-commerce accounted for less than 0.3% of the overall retail business till March 2011, but was likely to become 1.4% of the total market by fiscal 2015. “One of the biggest enablers of e-commerce is good quality and affordable broadband,” Bhide said. “Both 3G and 4G are expected to drive penetration in India. However, the advantage of 4G is that it would be a big enabler for Internet commerce on devices such as mobile phones.”
In Japan and China, transactions on mobile devices account for 15-20% of the e-commerce market.
Doing its own thing
But even as it makes sure to get the product right, RIL hasn’t lost sight of one source of its competitiveness across businesses—cost. Two RIL executives, including the one mentioned in the first instance, said the company’s pricing of 4G services would remind consumers of the “Monsoon Hungama” offer launched by the erstwhile Reliance Infocomm in 2003, wherein it offered a multimedia mobile phone and a connection for an upfront payment as low as Rs.501.
Thakkar of KPMG said a disruptive pricing strategy can ensure the success of the venture, with the use of tablets and smartphones among middle-class Indian already on the rise.
After initially calling for bids for towers and networks, RIL has now decided to build its own, according to a third RIL executive, who spoke to Mint on the sidelines of the company’s shareholder meeting and on condition of anonymity.
This person claimed the company would soon start work on its underground cable network and towers. “It will be cheaper for us to build this network organically since the valuation and rentals of such assets is unviable at present. If we can bring down the cost, we can pass on the benefit to the consumers as well. We have built it once while rolling out telecom services in 2002, and we can do it again,” he said.
A New Delhi-based telecom expert, formerly a senior executive at a top telco, subsequently said that this could be a negotiating position to force tower companies to bring down their rates.
“There are enough and more tower companies and OFC (optical fibre cable) network owners who are looking for tenants. So it is not as if we are short on infrastructure, and I don’t see why rentals will be unreasonable,” said the head of the telecom practice at an international consulting firm, who declined to be identified. “Building own infrastructure, especially towers in urban areas, can be a challenge in terms of cost, space and getting permissions.”
Still, a senior government official familiar with the development, who did not want to be identified, said RIL has already started laying back-end optical fibre on the so-called trunk routes, or those that connect network traffic from one part of the country to another, across the nation, and that it would start on the cities later. This person confirmed that RIL had sought and received bids from tower and network companies, but said he didn’t know whether it was the price quoted or some other factor that convinced RIL to do its own thing.
If the company insists on building its own infrastructure, it will take longer to roll out its service. The head of the telecom practice with another international audit and consulting firm said RIL should look to leverage the existing towers and OFC network in the country to begin with and look to build its own capacity, if it so wants, gradually over a period of time.
The government official also said that RIL is yet to decide on a device or tablet of choice that it could bundle with its service. Still, while gaps remain in terms of what the world knows of Mukesh Ambani’s 4G plans, it is evident that many of the pieces are in place and that a bigger picture is slowly beginning to emerge.
***********
RIL’S CHOICE: TD-LTE
TD-LTE is a fourth-generation (4G) mobile communication technology that allows a peak download speed of 100 megabits per second (Mbps) on wireless devices, against 20 Mbps for 3G technologies. Its main advantage, in addition to speed, is that it is an extension of the popular GSM wireless technology and is compatible with both 2G and 3G networks. This essentially means that when a user moves out of an area covered by a 4G network, he will still be able to access communication services in wider 2G or 3G networks using the same device. It has a variant called Frequency-Division Long-Term Evolution (FD-LTE).
State-run telcos, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd also operate WiMax technology-based wireless broadband services, but all other operators that won spectrum in the 2010 broadband wireless access (BWA) spectrum auction are rolling out TD-LTE-based services. The US-based mobile chip maker, Qualcomm Inc., recently announced that it was selling its BWA companies in India to Bharti Airtel Ltd in a staggered deal ending in a complete acquisition by end-2014. Bharti has already launched 4G services in Bangalore and Kolkata. Other companies expected to launch services soon include Tikona Digital Networks Pvt. Ltd, Aircel Ltd and Augere Ltd.

Online sales surf higher on coupon sites’ traffic In November, 27.2 million users above the age of 15 years -- or 59% of the 46.4 million Internet audience in the country -- engaged in retail activity compared with 23.02 million -- or 56% of the 41.2 million users in 2010

The number of Indian Internet shoppers around the festive season rose by 18% in November 2011 compared to the same month a year ago, spurred by bargain hunters thronging coupon sites that allow online purchase of a discounted service or product, a study released by U.S.-based Web research group comScore showed.

In November, 27.2 million users above the age of 15 years -- or 59% of the 46.4 million Internet audience in the country -- engaged in retail activity compared with 23.02 million -- or 56% of the 41.2 million users in 2010. The study signaled a six-fold jump to 7.6 million visitors for coupon sites, such as www.snapdeal.com and www.mydala.com, that are driving up online retail traffic by hawking cut-price restaurant meals, gym memberships, clothes, watches and perfumes.“Indians love deals,” said Ashish Pherwani, Associate Director of accounting firm Ernst & Young’s media practice. “Sites that provide deals on standardised products like mobile phones, (branded) clothes are seeing interest from younger buyers.
But youth rushing to Web sites for bargains are still a small fraction of the total audience, Pherwani said. Moreover, the rise in traffic may be fueled by a jump in advertising spends by these sites that are seeing increased infusion of private equity money.
 Users such as Chennai-based real estate consultant Stuthi Vijayaraghavan and school teacher Deepa Diwakar are switching to online purchases for haggle-free discounts, to avoid bustling mall traffic and for better choice in a city that is less of a shopper’s paradise than Mumbai, Delhi or Bangalore.
Diwakar made an online purchase of a branded iron box labeled at Rs. 1,200 availing a Rs250, or 20%, discount and received the package within a week.
“Malls are always crowded and the selection is never satisfactory,” said Vijayaraghavan, who is determined to find better online shopping sources despite mixed experiences from trying sites such as www.BeStylish.com selling shoes that she rates as a B+ for not having a great collection and www.Flipkart.com -- an online store selling books, electronics and music -- that she labels as an A for its wide collection and quick delivery.
“Usually, for books I browse at book stores and sometimes not find the title I want but now I just go to Flipkart,” Vijayaraghavan said.
Flipkart, which logged Rs50 crore in revenues in 2010, is expecting sales to touch 10 times that number or Rs500-600 crore this year and is eying the $1 billion or Rs. 52,700 crore mark by 2015. The five-year-old Bangalore-based Internet seller makes 30,000 shipments a day across the country.
 ”Prices offered online are about 15-20% cheaper than prices offered offline at retail stores across categories such as apparel, books etc which drives greater consumer traffic,” said Namrata Balwani, chief operating officer, Media2win, a Mumbai-based digital agency, adding that sales spurts are definitely higher during festivals such as Diwali and Christmas.
 Christmas sales for Flipkart, which claims to be India’s largest online book retailer and has 2 million registered users, are 10 times the figure last year and Snapdeals’ chief executive Kunal Behl said his site has seen a 75% monthly sales growth during the festive season starting September versus a 45% jump earlier in the year. Snapdeal currently has 12 million registered users and hopes to grow 10-fold next year.
 Behl added that Internet retail is solving the problem of access for consumers living in smaller cities and towns who have aspirations coupled with disposable incomes.
”Forty percent of our sales comes from tier II cities and beyond,” Snapdeals’ Behl said without mentioning a revenue figure.

Tata’s retail firm enters ecommerce “The online store and the physical retail store chain would be two separate entities and will have individual strategies in terms of deals available and will compete with each other,” said Ajit Joshi, CEO

Infiniti Retail Ltd, a 100% subsidiary of Tata Sons Ltd, on Monday entered the ecommerce space, launching cromaretail.com to compete alongside the group’s retail store chain Croma and with sites such as Flipkart.com.
“The online store and the physical retail store chain would be two separate entities and will have individual strategies in terms of deals available and will compete with each other,” said Ajit Joshi, chief executive officer, Infiniti Retail, who expects the website to equal the six-year-old retail chain’s revenue in the next “18 to 24 months.”
The launch saw the attendance of Ratan Tata, chairman, Tata Sons, and his designated successor, Cyrus Mistry, currently deputy chairman, besides R.K. Krishna Kumar, chairman, Infiniti Retail, and director, Tata Sons.The Croma retail chain has 72 stores in 14 states across, covering 6 lakh sq ft.
For the year ended March, Infiniti Retail posted a 29% growth in revenue?? to Rs1,970 crore. The company will make a profit in the coming year and is currently profitable at the store level, Joshi said.
“Electronic retail has the highest acceptance among fashion and home in online commerce as the brands are well defined and there is a manufacturer guarantee and warranty on sales,” said Ankur Warikoo, chief executive officer, Crazeal.com, the Indian unit of Groupon.com.
According to a November report on the digital consumer industry by Avendus Capital Pvt. Ltd, e-tailing is set to become a Rs. 53,000 crore market by 2015 from Rs. 3,600 crore now, but will still account for just around 1.4% of the retail market in India.
Currently, India’s largest listed retailer by revenues, Pantaloons Retail India Ltd, has an online presence through futurebazaar.com and Shoppers Stop Ltd has an online portal for its Crossword book retail business, crossword.in. The portal and retail chain have two distinct strategies and compete with each other.

Fashionara, Jabong, FutureBazaar, Myntra Ecommerce sites future with critics

Shopping online in India is an impersonal experience. It’s been mechanical. This was something I wanted to address. You buy something beautiful and it comes wrapped in ugly plastic,” says Arun Sirdeshmukh, CEO, Fashionara.com. “Instead, we gift-wrap each item you buy from our site, so it’s easy to gift, but even if you’re buying something for yourself, it feels special. That’s just one of the things we did to make the experience personal.”
E-commerce has been around for over a decade now, but it’s still finding its feet. Barring a few success stories such as Flipkart, the market has been crowded with me-too websites which faded away, died or were acquired and then cut to pieces.
People are definitely keen to purchase things online. Anita Phukan, a 25-year-old freelance writer living in Dibrugarh, Assam, and a regular Internet shopper, says: “In Assam, our small, slightly unreachable town now has access to many brands for the first time. Recently, the local Blue Dart office called me to apologize for the delay in one of my packages. It was because there were 500 deliveries piled up with them and they said they were all from e-commerce sites.”
Some of the most successful examples are service providers—sites such as IRCTC.com, JustDial.com and MakeMyTrip.com. In five years, Flipkart has become a household name, becoming more well-known than established firms such as Indiaplaza. Why haven’t others been able to do the same?
Despite a lot of investment ($298 million—or Rs. 1,668 crore now—in the year till October 2011, up from $47 million in the corresponding period in 2010, as previously reported in Mint), the online retail sector remains unsettled, and many of the new players seem more interested in attracting users through discounts than in building for the long term.
Chris George, founder and group CEO of digital marketing services provider EBS Worldwide, says these sites have focused on acquiring customers rather than making profits. “This is starting to make a lot of them feel the pinch. But the conditions in India are right for e-commerce now. People are comfortable with the Internet and online payments are secure,” he says. George was one of the early investors in e-commerce in India, launching EasyBuyMusic.com in 2000.
E-commerce transactions were Rs. 19,688 crore in 2009, and crossed Rs. 45,000 crore in 2011, according to estimates by the Internet and Mobile Association of India (Iamai).
That e-commerce is growing in India is clear, but can this last?
Anupam Saxena, associate editor of the industry news and analysis website MediaNama, says: “There are a lot of issues in front of Indian e-commerce sites today. The sites are interchangeable, there’s no reason to pick one over the other right now, so people chase deals. The sites need to get more creative.”
Alok Kejriwal, owner and founder of the 2Win group, says: “People say things like cash on delivery are essential, but seven years ago, IRCTC asked for a credit card. MakeMyTrip asks for a credit card. People are taking the wrong lessons and trying to build their businesses too quickly, and this is making the air toxic.”
Based on our own analysis and the recommendations of these and other industry watchers, we’ve put together a list of some of the most promising start-ups in online retail today. In the order of their founding, these are:

Myntra
Founded in February 2007 as a gift personalization service, Myntra sold custom-printed goods such as T-shirts and mugs; it grew quickly but then plateaued. In 2011, it ventured into fashion and lifestyle products. Much like Flipkart, Myntra focused on making its system easy to use (through cash on delivery, simple returns) and on speedy deliveries, counting on customer service to drive growth.
Getting here
Partner act: Ashutosh Lawania (right) and Mukesh Bansal, Myntra co-founders. 

In 2007, e-commerce was starting to take shape in India, and a lot of the early problems were getting resolved. Ashutosh Lawania, 34, the Bangalore-based co-founder and head of sales, Myntra.com, says: “We were the only player in the personalization space. This afforded good early growth, but we realized that we needed to expand our offerings to continue to grow.” The founders decided fashion was the best choice for them.Lawania speaks softly and deliberately, but as you get him talking about the early days of their business, you can hear the enthusiasm underlying his words. He says, “The overall apparel and textile industry was around $50 billion in 2010, and there were no established players, only start-ups.”
Myntra’s site is simple to use, and very visual. They set a template which most sites now use—thumbnails from which users can pick individual items to zoom into, with filters to make it easy to find specific products.
Instead of focusing on deals and discounts, as other start-ups were doing, Myntra aimed mostly at current trends in fashion. Lawania says: “We decided early on to focus on getting the buyers who want the latest and best products. Around 80% of the fashion business is current season, discounted products are only a small portion of the business.”
Missteps
“We have done better than we could’ve hoped for. If there was anything to change, it would be that we should have entered the fashion sector even sooner. We spent too long studying the market, but we wanted to make sure that we were fully prepared,” says Lawania.
The road ahead
“Our vision is to democratize fashion. For people outside of the big cities, the major brands still don’t have any physical presence. Instead of offering last year’s products at a big discount, we want to make it possible for anyone, anywhere to look good,” says Lawania.
Our view
Despite having done well so far, Myntra might find the most challenging time lies ahead, as competition in the fashion segment builds up. It will need to innovate to keep customers interested, but it’s starting from a strong position.

FutureBazaar
Founded in December 2007 with a focus on electronics, FutureBazaar.com is one of the top 10 e-commerce companies in India. It has shown a willingness to change focus to react to the needs of the market, going from electronics to a much larger basket of goods.
On site: Kashyap Deorah of FutureBazaar. Photo: Abhijit Bhatlekar/Mint
On site: Kashyap Deorah of FutureBazaar. 

The big turning point for the firm was in 2010-11, when it built closer ties with its parent company, the Future Group (which includes Big Bazaar, Pantaloon and HomeTown), which helped it to operate in more segments, and to operate more efficiently with the offline operations.Getting here
FutureBazaar has been headed by Kashyap Deorah since March 2011. The 33-year-old CEO started his own e-commerce business as a final-year student at the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay in 1999, before moving to the US to work for the company that acquired his business. He returned to India in November 2007 and launched Chaupaati Bazaar, a phone-in retail business, which was acquired by FutureBazaar in 2010. “In October 2010, we relaunched FutureBazaar as a destination for deals in electronics.”
  This cost-driven model would continue for one year, but by 2011, the focus was shifting. Mumbai-based Deorah says: “Now, our focus was on home technology, ghar ka samaan. With the Big Bazaar integration, distribution and warehousing was solved for us.”
This is just the start, though. According to Deorah, the real volumes will come from products that are linked to their physical stores, and “the biggest volume driver is going to be groceries, which we’ve rolled out in Mumbai now, and are going to scale across major Indian cities in the next year or two”. You can order Big Bazaar items from the website, and there is no minimum order, though the site charges Rs. 50 for delivery.
Missteps
This, however, has led to a cluttered website. The home page is confusing, with deals from different categories presented with no obvious organization. Video cables, mithai (sweets), pillows and backpacks are all lined up together, and it takes a second to find what you want within the categories.
“Of course we made mistakes along the way,” Deorah says, “but the real one was not fully leveraging the (Future) group’s strengths during our relaunch in 2010.” Instead, the company focused entirely on electronic products, and Deorah adds ruefully, “If we could change things, we would have held off a lot of big spending in 2010 to bolster our current growth plans.”
The road ahead
The physical stores simplify logistics for FutureBazaar. More interesting is the extent of its cash-on-delivery (CoD) business—the figure is over 50% for the industry, but Deorah enthusiastically points out, “CoD is only 20% of our sales”. Instead, they promote loyalty with cashback incentives and buyer rewards.
The company is also investing heavily in technology, since its software requirements are specific. Deorah says, “You’re going to see the more successful e-commerce companies also developing a lot of technology themselves.”
Our view
The hub-and-spoke model of physical stores supplementing the reach of the website is what makes FutureBazaar such a promising e-commerce model in India. Going forward, its limited reliance on cash on delivery, and focus on low-cost, high-volume transactions, could lead to success for the brand.

Jabong
Manu Kumar Jain (in a check shirt) and Praveen Sinha, Jabong’s co-founders. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint
Manu Kumar Jain (in a check shirt) and Praveen Sinha, Jabong’s co-founders. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint
Launched in October and live from January, Jabong.com has quickly become one of the top e-commerce sites in India. Internet rankings website Alexa, which measures website visits around the world, places Jabong as the 63rd most popular website in India—beating every retail site except Flipkart (at No. 15). The site focuses on fashion and retail, and has grown quickly by focusing on customer service.Getting here
While there were already some sites in the fashion and apparel sector, there was little innovation in customer service, says Manu Kumar Jain, co-founder and managing director, Jabong.com, Gurgaon. The 31-year-old entrepreneur (a product of IIT Delhi and the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta), says: “Fashion and apparel is still a largely untapped sector in Indian e-commerce. It’s got the right kind of profile for e-commerce as well, because it’s an aspirational product category, but people lack access to fashion.”
For Jain, the mandate was clear—roll out new features and build an audience before the established players could react. He says: “We did a lot of things that should’ve been there already. We were one of the first sites with a 30-day return policy, and today we are trying to offer same-day delivery in the top 10 metros. We pioneered card-on-delivery payments, so customers who aren’t comfortable with using a card online don’t have to keep cash handy.”
The company has concentrated on building depth while staying focused on fashion. “With over 400 brands and 50,000 products, we have possibly the largest selection right now and we’re building that up still.”
Jabong’s site looks a lot like Myntra. Each section is dominated by large pictures and a photo catalogue. This is easy to use, but puts the spotlight on deals, something both sites say isn’t a primary focus. Jabong’s layout is easier to navigate, but by and large it seems to be willing to adopt ideas from the competition to grow quickly.
Missteps
At this early stage, it’s too soon to say if Jabong has made any real mistakes. Certainly the company is doing far better than planned. Jain says, “We have gone in the right directions, and grown better than expected.”
The road ahead
Jabong has been growing through word of mouth and targeted online advertising on social media. Jain says: “We listen to customer feedback and we’ve had a great response. We see repeat visitors at well above the industry average because of the commitment to customer service, and this is going to help us grow profitably.”
Our view
Despite the quick start, Jabong has a lot to do. The brand must keep introducing new reasons for customers to keep visiting. For long-term success, it needs to be able to balance growth and profitability.

Fashionara
Arun Sirdeshmukh of Fashionara. Photo: Aniruddha Chowdhury/Mint
Arun Sirdeshmukh of Fashionara. Photo: Aniruddha Chowdhury/Mint
Launched in May, Bangalore-based Fashionara.com is the newest firm on our list, but it is doing things differently for the segment. Founded by Sirdeshmukh, former CEO of Reliance Trends, and Darpan Munjal, president of e-commerce consulting firm LeapMatrix, Fashionara is focusing on making the experience of using the website as easy as possible, and is trying to appeal to a more mature set of buyers, than other fashion sites.Getting here
Even on the phone, Sirdeshmukh, 46, has a commanding presence. He speaks like a practised orator: “I have a history in start-ups and in this particular vertical. When I felt that Reliance Trends was well set up, I felt the urge to do something new. E-commerce seemed like a good next step because I think that it’s changing the world.”
 Sirdeshmukh, who worked with Van Heusen, Louis Philippe, Indigo Nation and Scullers before joining Reliance Trends, felt he could bring something new to the existing e-commerce scene.
 “What most people do is sell like a catalogue. That’s not really useful for buyers,” he says. “What we offer is a curated site, with a focus on fashion.” To that end, Fashionara is one of the most visually distinctive sites around—it resembles the social network Pinterest more than a retail site, with users able to quickly customize views to their liking.
Products have detailed descriptions—of the material and design, but also of the items they can be paired with, and the settings they’re most appropriate for. This level of detail makes it one of the easiest sites to navigate. At the same time, there are lots of detailed photos, and even videos of products, so users can see what a particular outfit looks like in motion. Sirdeshmukh says: “Clothing is meant to be seen. The site reflects that.”
Missteps
So far, the company seems to have made the right moves, particularly in differentiating itself from the competition by having one of the best-looking and simple-to-use websites.
The road ahead
Fashionara plans to grow by adding depth within its product range, while still being picky about the brands it partners with. Sirdeshmukh is emphatic: “The focus has been on improving the existing experience. We’re not going after deals because we think people will pay a little extra for a better experience.” For example, aside from the regular free delivery, Fashionara offers overnight delivery (or same day in Bangalore) in major metros, for which it charges Rs. 199 (or Rs. 99 in Bangalore). Charging for express delivery is unheard of in India, yet it actually gives the customer a choice to expedite shopping before a special occasion.
Sirdeshmukh adds: “There are some shoppers who are loyal to the deals. They are usually younger, and will not stay loyal to a site. We want the shoppers who are willing to pay a little more for the best experience.”
Our view
With its highly visual approach, Fashionara immediately catches the eye. Lookbooks, where all the elements in outfits for different settings link to product pages, are a new idea for Indian e-commerce, and Fashionara is focusing on this, as well as an online fashion magazine. These ideas, it hopes, will help users find products they may have missed otherwise.

Cocktail format was not familiar territory for me: Homi Adajania

A scene from Cocktail
Having debuted with an off-beat film like Being Cyrus, director Homi Adajania is back with a not so familiar territory of romantic-comedy in Cocktail saying he had second thoughts on helming the project.
"I would have never written a story like this and that is what I felt when I was offered to do Cocktail. Dinesh Vijan, the producer of the film, told me about Cocktail that Imtiaz Ali had written. I heard the story and I was like why should I tell this story," Homi told PTI.
"Dinesh felt I will give a fresh take on this story because it is not a familiar territory for me. I did not buy his idea at that time. I told him I am not interested," Homi said.
But now that film's release is just round the corner, the director says, "He (Dinesh) persuaded me for a month. Then I actually realised that I am not doing this film because I don't know how to do it and I am scared of that. This format was not my format of narrative...doing songs, there was nothing psychotic in the film, it was just a nice beautiful love story. And one day I told him I am doing it." .
Homi made his directorial debut with psycho-drama Being Cyrus revolving around a dysfunctional Parsi family.
The story of Saif Ali Khan-Deepika Padukone starrer Cocktail was penned by Imtiaz Ali, which Homi moulded in his own style while retaining the original plot.
On if directing someone else's story was difficult, Homi says, "It wasn't difficult...no not at all. It was definitely a change in concept of telling someone else's story. Imtiaz had narrated the story...Dinesh and I developed the screenplay.
"That is when I started making all the moments of the film as mine. I started drafting scenes, characters. I pretty much stuck to the story that I was given. As soon as I made it as my film, the strangeness went away," he said.
On his sudden disappearance from the world of films, Homi said, "When I made Being Cyrus I did not make it with an ambition to be a filmmaker, churning out films. After the film was done, I went back to my life, did lots of things like travelling, reading, scuba diving, having a kid."
As for the the star cast, Saif Ali Khan was not the original choice for Cocktail, while co-star Deepika was offered both the roles of the female lead in the movie.
"Saif was not the first choice, Imran Khan was supposed to do it but he was not sure if he wanted to do it at that point of time. As Saif is the producer, he was going through the script, he read and loved it," Homi said.
"Deepika was part of the film and she was offered both the roles and she chose Veronica. We decided not to cast an actor for the role of Meera because I did not want someone to come with baggage.
"I wanted someone who would be naturally awkward and nervous in front of camera, because that is what the character is and I wanted to use it for the character. So Diana Penty was chosen," he said.
Besides, Saif, Deepika and Diana, the film also stars Dimple Kapadia and Boman Irani while Randeep Hooda makes a special appearance.
"Dimple and Boman are also there in the film and it is not like they were in Being Cyrus so are part of this film as well. It was not a matter of familiarity but using talented actors who fit the bill," he said.
"Randeep is doing a special appearance. He was completely happy walking in and doing a small part. It is pivotal role but a small one," the director said.
Homi admits that with Cocktail, he has now become more comfortable in the format of romantic stories.
"Now that I have made it I feel very comfortable telling a story like this. I like the concept of love stories and playing with emotions because apart from this (love) being a universal theme...I feel love reminds us of how vulnerable we are," Homi said.
"I think when we make love stories we can revisit lot of things in ourselves also. Like while making this film, I felt there were lot of people who were a part of my life as the characters, the situations. So it gives you a sense of nostalgia," he said.

Farah Khan is great fun: Boman Irani

After having directed masala entertainers, filmmaker-turned- actress, Farah Khan is stepping in front of the camera.
Farah, who is a mother of triplets, is now making her debut with actor Boman Irani in Shirin Farhad Ki Toh Nikal Padi.
Boman is all praises for Farah as an actor. “Farah was quite nervous as she kept telling us, but when we started shooting, she seemed to be at ease in front of the camera. It was quite an experience working with her. She is great fun to be around. Looking at her, one wouldn’t be able to tell that this is her film first as an actor. She is great,” says Boman.
The film is about two 40-year-olds falling in love with each other. The film traces the journey of Farhad Pastakiya (Boman), a 45-year-old Parsi bachelor working as a bra and panty salesman. Farhad has never found love but he hasn’t given up on life and that is when he meets Shirin Fugawala (Farah), 40-year-old, bubbly, straightforward, Parsi. All hell breaks loose as Frahad’s mother Nargis realises that her son’s dream girl is her sworn enemy. To fit into the role of Shirin, Farah worked a lot on her body and lost oodles of weight.
A source from the sets narrated a very interesting incident that happened while shooting recently.
“Boman, who plays a lingerie salesman was so obsessed with his role that he also got a cake in the shape of a bra for Farah’s birthday. On seeing the cake, Farah and the entire unit burst into a fit of laughter. Farah was later spotted talking about it with her friends.”

ZOROASTRIAN RHAPSODY

A new biography reveals the Parsi origins that Freddie Mercury tried so hard to hide

I’VE BEEN trying to remember when I first worked out that an Indian had become the first international rock star from the subcontinent. My guess is that it was in 1974. That was the year Queen released a pop song about a high-class call girl which they called Killer Queen. ( She keeps moët et chandon in a pretty cabinet.)
 
DESI ROOTS 
Gossip had it that Hollywood actress Merle Oberon (below right) was an Anglo-Indian from Bombay and Cliff Richard’s (below left) official biographies said that he was born Harry Webb in Lucknow I liked the song as did most people – it eventually got to number one on some charts. But I was especially intrigued by the lead singer, one Freddie Mercury. Surely he looks Indian, I thought to myself.
But Freddie said he wasn’t Indian. All stories about Queen took the line that the band was entirely English. This did not surprise me too much. In those days, those of us who lived in the UK were used to stars who denied their Indian-ness. The Hollywood actress Merle Oberon claimed to be Tasmanian but gossip had it she was an AngloIndian from Bombay. (The gossip was correct. After her death, biographers discovered that she was an Anglo-Indian girl called Queenie, probably from Colaba).
Then there were the stories about Cliff Richard. His official biographies all said that he was born Harry Webb in Lucknow but suggested that his parents had lived in the colonies as representatives of the Empire. Our own Anglo-Indians thought differently: he was one of their own, they said proudly.
And how about Gerry Dorsey, alias Engelbert Humperdinck? His official biographies admitted to a Madras connection but denied that he had any Indian blood. Once again, we knew better. “Part Indian but hides it”, we muttered under our breath.
The thing about Merle Oberon, Cliff Richard and Engelbert was that they were all old showbiz where you always pretended to be entirely Western (all right, white). But rock and roll was different. There was no shame in coming from a foreign country or in not being white. Forget about all the black singers. What about Robert Plant of Led Zeppelin, who was married to an Anglo-Indian and would go to Indian restaurants and demand the hottest curries, boasting that he was Indian by marriage? George Harrison was so into Indian culture that the British rock press took to calling him ‘Hari’ (after ‘Hari Georgeson’, a pseudonym he sometimes used.)
So why would any rock star want, in 1974, to deny that he had Indian roots?


The British press was content to accept Freddie’s stories about his origins, but the American rock press probed deeper. When Queen went to Japan in April 1975, RollingStone interviewed Freddie and pointed out that his real name was Balsara. After that, none of the band’s obfuscations and denials cut much ice with me.
Most Indians knew that Balsara was a Parsi surname and when you looked at Freddie (even during his long-haired phase) there was no doubt that he had Parsi features, no matter what he said about his English origins.
Bit by bit, by the end of the Seventies, Queen were forced to accept that their lead singer was not quite as English as roast beef and fish and chips. At first, the band put it about that Freddie was born in Zanzibar, which made him sound rather exotic because few Queen fans knew where Zanzibar was. (It is in Africa.) Then, interviewers were told that Freddie had ‘Persian blood’. (Ah yes, that old Parsi chestnut.) When people asked about his education, the band’s management suggested that Freddie had done part of his schooling in India because his father was a civil servant in the service of the Empire. (In the Sixties? What Empire?)
Freddie encouraged the lies and deceptions. I remember reading an interview with him in the Eighties. When the interviewer said he wanted to discuss the relatives Freddie had left behind in India, the singer refused to discuss the subject, simpering, “How mundane, darling! Let’s talk about something else.”
But then, Freddie lied about a lot of things. He lied about being gay, for instance, even though he had no need to. David Bowie came out as bisexual in 1972 and went to record company offices in a dress. Elton John said he was bisexual in 1976. (“I think people should draw the line at goats,” he told Rolling Stone about his preferences.)
Though Freddie was camper than either of these stars, he refused to admit that he was gay or even bisexual. Nor did he confirm stories that he was suffering from AIDS even when he looked visibly ill. Only, on the eve of his death, did he admit to AIDS. The gay stories only tumbled out posthumously. Why did Freddie need to lie? I’ve been reading FreddieMercury,
The Definitive Biography by Lesley-Ann Jones, a former rock journalist who writes with all the ruthless detachment of a panting fan-magazine columnist. And even Jones, who believes that Freddie could do no wrong, has no explanation for the deceptions. The best she can manage is: “Perhaps Freddie believed that music fans of the 1970s were not ready for a rock star with African and Indian roots.” Really? Then why did he keep lying well into the 1980s, when fans were certainly ready for the truth?
Worse still, Jones wants to keep Freddie’s lies alive. An unnamed spokesman for the Parsi community is quoted as saying “the fact that we migrated to India does not make us Indian. If you are a Jew, but your family have not lived in Palestine for the past 2000 years, does that make you less Jewish?”
This kind of he-was-Persian-really nonsense is used to also defend Freddie’s lies about his sexuality. “For Parsis, homosexuality is not only sinful, but a form, unimaginably, of devil worship."
So let’s get this right. Freddie hid the fact that he was Parsi because rock fans were not ready for it and he hid his homosexuality because he was a Parsi which – let’s see – he also denied…
The story of Freddie’s early life that emerges from Jones’ book is depressingly mundane. His father was a Parsi clerk, who went to work in Zanzibar. He sent his son Farrokh to St Peter’s in Panchgani, near Bombay, and struggled to pay the fees. Freddie joined a pop band in Bombay with Parsi and AngloIndian friends. He had relatives in Dadar Parsi Colony. He was shy. He was effeminate and probably gay, even at an early age.
Political changes in Zanzibar forced his parents to move to England in 1964. His father got a job as a cashier in a restaurant. His mother worked at Marks & Spencer. They lived in the depressing London suburb of Feltham. Freddie went to art school in nearby Ealing, then tried hard to make a living, coming back regularly to Feltham for his mother’s dhansak.
Then, one of the bands he joined – Queen – began to look like it would make it. Freddie dropped the Balsara, took on the name Mercury, rarely talked about the revealing fact that his parents were called Bomi and Jer and that his sister’s name was Kashmira, and concealed his love of dhansak. The flamboyant, over-the-top, but never openly-gay Mercury persona became the invention behind which he hid his origins and his ethnicity.
Would it have mattered if he had told the truth? I don’t think anyone is under any obligation to reveal his or her sexuality so I don’t accept the argument – frequently advanced by gay groups – that Freddie should have come out so that young homosexuals were encouraged by his example. Nor do I think it was incumbent on him to admit he was HIV-positive. It was a private matter and it was his own decision to make.
As for his ethnicity, yes, all of us would have been thrilled to identify with an Indian rock star. But that’s not important. Freddie owed us nothing; he had no reason to serve as an idol or role model to us.
But, ask yourself this: what kind of man hides his nationality, lies about his origins and pretends to be somebody he is not? Consider Freddie’s behaviour with an old school friend who came up to him during his super-stardom days. According to Jones’ biography: “Freddie looked right through this poor fellow and said to him, ‘I’m sorry, but I am afraid I just don’t know who you are’.” Even after he’d made it, when it would cost him nothing to acknowledge the Indian friends from his childhood, Freddie pretended that he did not know who they were.
Somewhere at his core, Farrokh Balsara must have really hated himself to deny so completely who he really was.