Sunday, September 15, 2013

10:07 AM

Slowdown creates opportunity for e-commerce to grow faster: Sachin Bansal

Slowdown creates opportunity for e-commerce to grow faster: Sachin Bansal

Bansal speaks about expanding into new product categories and the shift to the marketplace model

Flipkart.com, which recently raised $200 million from investors, including Accel Partners and Tiger Global, is the face of e-commerce in India. Having launched its marketplace platform earlier this year, the company has also attracted the attention of regulators, who have banned foreign direct investment (FDI) in e-commerce. In February, Flipkart effectively moved to Singapore, setting up Flipkart Holdings Singapore that owns and runs the technology and the back-end, and selling the front-end operationWS Retail Services to a group of Indian investors. The change came even as India’s Enforcement Directorate was probing the company for violations of India’s foreign exchange laws. Indian laws do not prohibit foreign investment in a marketplace.
In an interview, co-founder and chief executive Sachin Bansal spoke about expanding into new product categories, the shift to the marketplace model (WS Retail is one of the sellers in Flipkart’s marketplace), the status of the probe by the Enforcement Directorate and working with co-founder Binny Bansal. Edited excerpts:
You started out as a bookseller and then entered many product categories over the years. What are the things or criteria for entering a new category?
E-commerce in India is a land grab opportunity. We see an opportunity in almost every category. The expansion is limited only by our capabilities because the market is huge. Reliability and scalability on the supply side are the main things.
Which new product categories are you looking at entering currently?
We’re already in most categories. What I’m looking forward to is (selling) large items—large electronics, refrigerators, TVs, washing machines, furniture, large sporting gear. There is a very big market for heavy, bulky items. We don’t have these and we’re focusing on how to solve it. It requires a different supply chain investment and we are going to make it. Another category is fashion. We are in it but we can make it huge. In India, the market for clothes and shoes is bigger than electronics.
You’ve exited some categories, online music store Flyte for example. What went wrong?
Our understanding of the market was not deep enough. But in a sense the launch of the product itself was the test for the market. Sometimes, we need a sense of over optimism otherwise you will never try things.
Flipkart launched its marketplace platform earlier this year. Do you own inventory or are you a pure marketplace?
All our sales (to consumers) happen through the marketplace now. We do keep some inventory. Some of the inventory we keep and sell it to our sellers. There are other B2B (business to business) players who buy from us as well. So our own inventory is for B2B sales and as support for sellers. We have 700 sellers now and we’re ramping up. In a year’s time, we want to get to 10,000 sellers.
When did you sell WS Retail (the company’s former front-end business)? What kind of business relationship does Flipkart have with WS Retail now?
It’s a seller on Flipkart now. It’s our largest seller in fact. The change happened a few years back when we made it a separate company. We started separating the front-end and backend of the business in 2009 and our idea was to get separate investors. As regulations changed, we had to sell it.
What’s the status of the Enforcement Directorate probe and what questions have they asked you?
Without getting into the specifics, government bodies have the right to ask questions and our job is to comply and answer their questions. We feel that we’re completely on the right side of the law and completely compliant with regulations. I wouldn’t be able to get into more specifics.
How much of your business comes from mobile and at what rate is that growing?
Twenty percent of our traffic comes from mobile, excluding tablets. 3G speeds are improving, rates have come down … The rate of growth on mobile is exponential.
What are the important things that you’ve learnt about the Indian consumer?
Lately, there have been service issues at Flipkart (regarding delivery of large items). We got a lot of negative publicity about it and rightly so. We did not meet our promises. But we are fixing that and we’ll come back … What that taught me is Indian consumers care deeply about service. That’s what our premise was when we started Flipkart. There were always players who were cheaper than us. We said we’ll differentiate Flipkart on service. And our success is living proof that Indian consumers greatly appreciate quality service and give more importance to service than just cheap prices.
E-commerce is a small sector right now. Even so, has the weak economy affected your growth?
E-commerce is too small right now to be influenced by macro factors. The slowdown possibly creates an opportunity for e-commerce to grow faster. If you look at Amazon, it’s faster after the recession of 2008. Consumers become more price and value conscious during a slowdown. Offline stores because of their high cost structure struggle during slowdown.
For entrepreneurs there’s always the question, when do I sell? What about you? Are you building to sell?
There are pros and cons for both sides. It’s about what the founders want. We want to build the company.
It can be one the largest e-commerce companies in the world; we can be in the top five. India can produce that kind of a company, given the number of the consumers. So we want to be independent and build the company. Our role models are not companies which have sold, but companies like Airtel andInfosys, which have built large businesses.
You’ve raised more money than probably any other start-up in India. What kind of pressure are you under from investors?
Investors invest money obviously where they can make money. From an investor point of view Flipkart is a gold mine. The market is huge and there’s no limit to growth and then you look at our leadership position—we’re more than a third of the market. Then you look at the kind of management talent here … If you put all that together the answer is obvious. I don’t feel the pressure. It’s a personal thing. The kind of investors we have are not just money investors. Tiger Global for example has 50-60 e-commerce investments. So they bring a great perspective.
As you grow larger how is your board evolving?
We want to make our board more independent. We have one independent director right now, Rajesh Magow, the CEO of MakeMyTrip. He’s added a lot of value and we’ll be looking to add more independent board members.
E-commerce is a new sector. Is it challenging to explain what you do to regulators? What regulations do you want passed?
We work very hard with trade and government bodies to build a case for e-commerce. They are taking some time to understand … On the regulations front, we would like to see stability. There’s uncertainty right now and it should not always be a catch up game. The definition of group company is an example—regulations on that have changed a few times and it’s still a bit ambiguous.
Flipkart has seen many executive departures at the senior management level. Is the company struggling to retain talent and what do you do to reduce attrition?
If someone thinks Flipkart is not the right place, or that there’s something better out there, there’s not much you can do. But trying to do a better job while hiring is one thing we can do.
When you hire, you don’t just look for capabilities. It’s also the alignment on what the company needs and what the hires want to do. We can do that better and we’ve been doing better after making a few mistakes. In any case, the number of senior executives who have left Flipkart is not more than for any other company.
It’s essential for start-ups that their founders have functional relationships, at the least. What are the dynamics between Binny Bansal and you?

Trust and understanding between founders are very important. Mistakes happen. There are disagreements and sometimes I would decide to do something because I was so passionate about it but it turned out to be the wrong decision. What we’ve been able to do is not blame each other for mistakes. If we’re not able to come to an agreement, the guy who’s more passionate about the issue will take the decision. But we never do things like, ‘I told you so.’ That’s wrong, even if you had told the other so! Having complementary skills is also important. Binny is able to analyse a lot of data, which I sometimes find difficult. Whereas I come from the other way—sometimes I form a hypothesis and then look at data.


10:03 AM

India working on formulating guidelines on e-commerce


India working on formulating guidelines on e-commerce

Consumer affairs ministry has sought suggestions from other ministries that include finance and IT to carry the plan forward
Consumer affairs minister K.V. Thomas says the problems faced by consumers in e-commerce need to be tackled globally since in many cases, buyers, sellers, manufacturers, website owners, payment gateways are located in different countries.
Consumer affairs minister K.V. Thomas says the problems faced by consumers in e-commerce need to be tackled globally since in many cases, buyers, sellers, manufacturers, website owners, payment gateways are located in different countries.
India is mulling formulating a comprehensive guideline to deal with e-commerce, a concept fast catching up in the country.
The consumer affairs ministry has already started working on this and has sought suggestions from other ministries that include finance and IT to carry the plan forward.
“No international level study has been conducted on the subject. However, to formulate a comprehensive policy on the issue, suggestions from other ministries such as ministry of finance, ministry of communications and information technology ...have been sought,” consumer affairs minister K.V. Thomas said in Rajya Sabha on Friday.
Answering a supplementary during the Question Hour, he said the subject of e-commerce was relatively new, but had become extremely crucial due to global digital integration,widespread use of internet and convenience of on-line business transactions.
During the July meeting of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), India had communicated its strong viewpoint supporting regulation of e-commerce to protect interest of global consumers, he said.
“The problems faced by consumers in e-commerce need to be tackled globally since in many cases, buyers, sellers, manufacturers, website owners, payment gateways are located in different countries,” Thomas said.
“India is in close touch with UNCTAD, International Consumer Protection and Enforcement Network, etc to ensure global co-operation in the matter,” he said.
To a question on cheating by online marketing companies, Thomas said in such cases, consumers are entitled to get relief in three levels of consumer fora at district, state or national levels.
10:02 AM

Intel Capital invests $16 mn in three Asian e-commerce firms

Intel Capital invests $16 mn in three Asian e-commerce firms

Of the three firms, two are from India—Snapdeal.com and Bright Lifecare that runs Healthkart.com
Intel Capital, one of the largest technology investors, last year invested $352 million across 150 deals globally, with nearly 57% of the funds invested outside the US.
Intel Capital, one of the largest technology investors, last year invested $352 million across 150 deals globally, with nearly 57% of the funds invested outside the US.
Intel Capital, US chip maker Intel Corp.’s global investment arm, has invested nearly $16 million in three online retail companies in Asia, including two in India—Snapdeal.com and Bright Lifecare Pvt. Ltd, which runs Healthkart.com.
The other investment was in existing portfolio company Reebonz.com, a private luxury goods retailer based in Singapore.
Snapdeal.com is a consumer goods marketplace and Healthkart sells nutrition, health and wellness products.
The investments were made public at the World Economic Forum in Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, on Friday.
“We see start-up companies across Asia-Pacific taking advantage of new business opportunities created by the spread of personal computing and broadband Internet access. These technologies allow entrepreneurs to reach new markets and customers, and offer innovative new services that will help to enrich the lives of people across Asia,” said Gregory Bryant, vice-president and general manager, Intel Asia-Pacific, in a statement.
Intel Capital, one of the largest technology investors, last year invested $352 million across 150 deals globally, with nearly 57% of the funds invested outside the US.
Intel Capital started investing in Asia-Pacific in 1998 and has since invested over $2 billion in more than 320 technology companies in the region. At least 60 of these companies have gone public or have been acquired.
10:00 AM

Amazon India adds toys, health and personal care products


Amazon adds toys, health and personal care products

The global e-commerce giant continues to add categories of products, and says more will come in time for Diwali


Amazon India on Thursday launched three new categories on its website, and added that more will be coming soon, in time for Diwali. When Amazon.in launched in June, it was selling books, movies and TV shows, and quickly expanded to include electronics devices such as mobile phones, cameras and computers and accessories. The company has now added toys, baby products, and personal care and healthcare appliances; home and kitchen category will be introduced soon.
Amit Agarwal, vice-president and country manager, Amazon India, said in the last three months since the company has been active in India, it has been focusing on three areas “selection, cost and reliability”.
In India, Amazon works as a managed marketplace and not a direct seller, and Agarwal said it has grown from 100 sellers to over 500 by now, and added that the number of sellers who are choosing Amazon’s logistics service (called Fulfillment by Amazon) is also steadily rising.
He added, “On the customer side, we can’t share a country break-up, but with the rising sellers, I think you can infer that customers are also there. Another thing, which we think is very positive, is that the sellers feedback has been that the number of people paying via credit cards is rising compared to cash on delivery payments, which shows increasing confidence.”
With the new categories, Amazon.in has added over 8,500 products, and now claims to offer over 9 million books, over 70,000 products, and over 1.7 million e-books. Agarwal also said the response to the Kindle hardware in India has been encouraging. While he could not share the number of Kindles sold, he said the response has been meeting expectations. Mobile usage of Amazon’s website might have been lower than expected though. Agarwal said, “In a country like India you’d expect everyone to be on mobile... but it’s been only three months and the traction on mobile is very good. Customers are discovering it, and we are committed to the platform, and will continue to develop it.” To that end, Amazon will be launching an India-specific Android app soon, he added.
When asked why these particular categories were chosen for launch at this point, compared to ones that are more established in the Indian e-commerce market (such as apparel), Agarwal said the company is looking at both the ecosystem to see what is feasible, and also looking at unmet customer demands. He added, “Amazon will continue to launch in new categories, and we’re not chasing events with category or products. I told my team that Diwali comes every year, we can pick the categories where we will make an impact.”

He also reiterated that the company still has only one active fulfilment centre, in Mumbai, and said more would be developed over time as the needs in India grow, adding that Amazon has a long-term plan for the market. Asked if recent fluctuations in the rupee might affect these plans, he said, “Our strategy is to focus on the constants for long-term planning. If you look at a month-long or a three-month event and plan for that, then you’re not really planning for growth.”

Monday, July 15, 2013

12:42 AM

Tiger Global, Accel invest $7.5 million in CommonFloor.com

Tiger Global, Accel invest $7.5 million in CommonFloor.com

The funding is primarily for setting up offices in multiple cities, enhancing technology and products
 
This is the third time the website has raised capital from Accel and the second time from Tiger Global. Photo: Bloomberg
This is the third time the website has raised capital from Accel and the second time from Tiger Global. Photo: Bloomberg
Bangalore: American hedge fund Tiger Global Management Llc and venture capital (VC) firm Accel Partners have partnered to invest $7.5 million (about Rs.45 crore) in real estate website CommonFloor.com.
This is the third time the website has raised capital from Accel and the second time from Tiger Global.
The latest funding is primarily for setting up offices in multiple cities, enhancing technology and products, and expanding in existing markets, said Sumit Jain, co-founder and chief executive, CommonFloor.com.
“This round of funding by our existing investors is a vote of confidence in our business model and traction that we have built in a short time through our differentiated offerings,” said Jain.
In 2009, the company raised capital from Accel Partners and last year from both Accel and Tiger Global. The investment amounts in both these deals were not disclosed.
The six-year-old firm, which combines online property search and apartment management among other requirements, has launched a mobile application for users with features like map search using a phone camera.
Investments by VC and private equity (PE) firms in the fast-growing but still nascent property website space have been substantially growing every year.
Such investments rose to about $12 million across seven deals in 2012, from about $3.9 million in two deals in 2011, according to estimates by researcher VCCEdge and Mint based on disclosed transactions.
In 2013, so far, there have been five other investments in property websites—three of these adding up to $18.8 million; details on the other two were not disclosed.
With significantly increased Internet penetration in India, it’s natural to project that a large part of property research will happen online, especially through neutral information providers such as CommonFloor, said Subrata Mitra, partner, Accel Partners.
“At Accel, we’re great believers of online efficiencies to be brought into large markets, and therefore CommonFloor was a natural investment target,” Mitra said in an emailed response. “We believe the company can dominate several large metros in India for real estate-related listings and research, and therefore the decision to double-down to enable the company to grow rapidly.”
Tiger Global, which has previously invested in travel website MakeMyTrip Ltd, didn’t respond to an email query.
PE firm Indus Balaji, which invested in Perfect Pincode in 2012, recently again invested $2 million in the Hyderabad-based property search company. “When the markets are a bit slow, it is a good time to invest,” said Mohit Ralhan, managing partner at Indus Balaji.
 
12:40 AM

From the ashes of Webvan, Amazon builds a grocery business

From the ashes of Webvan, Amazon builds a grocery business

Opportunity for Amazon is huge as the grocery business in US generated $568 bn in retail sales last year 
 
A file photo of an Amazon fresh delivery van in Los Angeles, California. Photo: Reuters
A file photo of an Amazon fresh delivery van in Los Angeles, California. 
 
The online grocery start-up Webvan may have been the single most expensive flame-out of the dot-com era, blowing through more than $800 million in venture capital and IPO proceeds in just over three years before shutting its doors in 2001.
Twelve years later, though, Webvan is rising from the dead—in the form of an online grocery business called AmazonFresh.
Four key Amazon.com Inc. executives—Doug Herrington, Peter Ham, Mick Mountz and Mark Mastandrea—are former Webvan officials who have spent years analyzing and fixing the problems that led to the start-up’s demise.
Kiva Systems, the robotics company that Amazon bought last year for $775 million in one of its largest-ever acquisitions, was built on ideas and technologies originally developed at Webvan and is a key part of the AmazonFresh strategy.
Even Webvan’s old Web address, webvan.com, is now part of the Amazon empire.
“We had a lot of Webvan DNA in the room and we drew on that experience a lot,” said Tom Furphy, who helped start AmazonFresh with Herrington and Ham before leaving to become a venture capitalist. “That was a good formula for building the business responsibly.”
Amazon declined to comment for this story, or make any AmazonFresh executives available for interviews.
Former Amazon and Webvan officials say Amazon drew three big lessons from the Webvan debacle: expand slowly, limit delivery to areas with a high concentration of potential customers, and focus relentlessly on warehouse efficiency.
The opportunity for Amazon is huge. The grocery business in the United States generated $568 billion in retail sales last year, with online accounting for less than 1%, and it’s among the last major retail sectors that the online giant has yet to tackle.
But the risks are large as well. Groceries are a notoriously low-margin business, and the aggressive expansion of discounters like Walmart has made the business even more cutthroat than it was in Webvan’s day.
And competition in the online grocery business is heating up. FreshDirect and Peapod have been plugging away for years, while traditional grocery chains like Safeway also do online ordering and delivery. Walmart is testing its own fast delivery service in some markets in the United States now.
Slow expansion
AmazonFresh now serves Seattle and Los Angeles, and it plans to launch in the San Francisco Bay Area later this year. If these cities go well, Amazon is eyeing 20 new markets for 2014.
But the big plans belie what has been one of Amazon’s most cautious entries into a new business since founder and Chief Executive Jeff Bezos started selling books online in the 1990s.
The grocery service started in just two Seattle neighborhoods, Medina and Mercer Island, in 2007, and then slowly spread to other Seattle communities over the next five years. It didn’t expand beyond Seattle until June 10 of this year, when it launched in Los Angeles.
The Los Angeles roll-out is similarly modest, covering only a few zip codes initially. “We know customers value this service but the economics remain challenging,” an Amazon spokeswoman said when describing the L.A. launch.
Webvan—which ironically was also the brainchild of a book-seller, Louis Borders—expanded to nine major metro areas just 18 months after it began serving the San Francisco Bay Area, former executives recall. (Borders, co-founder of the now-defunct Borders Books & Music, declined to comment for this story.)
Webvan began its big expansion in Atlanta while the San Francisco service was still “wobbly,” recalls Krishna Hegde, Webvan’s vice president of deployment and systems engineering.
After the Atlanta launch in April 2000, Hegde said he recommended that the company slow down. But Mark Zaleski, president of operations, argued the company should press on because of promises made to Wall Street investors, Hegde said. Zaleski could be not be reached for comment.
Webvan “committed the cardinal sin of retail, which is to expand into a new territory—in our case several territories—before we had demonstrated success in the first market,” said Mike Moritz, a Webvan board member and partner at Sequoia Capital, one of the company’s venture capital backers. “In fact, we were busy demonstrating failure in the Bay Area market while we expanded into other regions.”
Delivery density
Webvan not only launched in many cities, it also offered service across entire metro areas. That resulted in the company’s delivery trucks making many trips where they only dropped off a few orders.
“The biggest failure of Webvan was delivery density,” said Gary Dahl, vice president of distribution at Webvan from 1997 to 2001. In the Bay Area, he said, Webvan made money delivering in San Francisco and Oakland, but lost a lot of money delivering in suburbs such as Orinda and Moraga.
“Mean travel time between delivery stops is the key to success in the home delivery business,” Dahl explained. “Travel one block in San Francisco and you have passed 200 people, travel one block in Moraga and you have passed about six people.”
AmazonFresh has tackled this problem by only delivering to densely populated areas of Seattle, and it’s taking the same approach in LA, according to Keith Anderson, an executive at consulting firm RetailNet Group.
“If you drive into certain neighborhoods in Seattle you will see a lot of front doors with AmazonFresh totes,” he said. “That’s because Amazon expanded gradually into specific neighborhoods and tried to deliver to lots of homes in those specific areas.”
FreshDirect covers more than 80% of the New York metro area, but it took the company about a decade to expand its delivery network this wide. Last year, FreshDirect launched in Philadelphia.
Kiva robots prove key
Webvan also suffered severely from weaknesses in the design and technology of its giant warehouses. At its first facility, there was a single conveyor belt that snaked about five miles through the building bringing items to workers, who would then pick and pack the products into totes, Webvan Chief Technology Officer Peter Relan said.
When the conveyor belt broke, the operation would grind to a halt, he recalled.
Mick Mountz, an MIT-trained Webvan executive, oversaw the picking and packing process, along with Mark Mastandrea, and together they tried out lots of technology to make the warehouse run more efficiently, according to Relan.
For each $100 bag of groceries, it cost Webvan about $30 to pick and pack; the company had to get that down to $10 to make the process economically viable.
Mountz came up with a solution based on multiple robots that would bring products from different parts of the warehouse to human workers for picking and packing. Unlike a conveyor belt, if a robot broke down it could be fixed while the other robots continued their work.
However, Webvan had spent so much on its original warehouse—about $100 million, according to Relan—that the company was loath to completely change the process in favor of robots.
After Webvan went bust in 2001, Mountz founded Kiva Systems, which designed and built robots that now zip around the warehouses of retailers including Staples Inc., Walgreen Co and Gap Inc.
Amazon bought Kiva in 2012 for $775 million. Mountz is still running Kiva, while Mastandrea became director of delivery experience at AmazonFresh in March.
“When there are a large number of products and the shapes and sizes vary, as they do in grocery, you still need a human at the end to do the picking and packing,” said Ajay Agarwal of Bain Capital Ventures, which was an early investor in Kiva. “The Kiva System is the best solution out there for that combination of warehouse technology and human workers.”
Amazon has one other thing Webvan never had: a huge, existing customer base. While Webvan had planned to expand into delivery of other goods once it had developed a base of grocery customers, Amazon is going the other way, and can help defray the cost of delivering groceries by delivering books or electronics at the same time.
There are other advantages that have accrued over time. The spread of cloud computing services—pioneered by Amazon’s Web Services business—makes it cheaper to run online businesses, while consumers are more comfortable buying online through faster Internet connections.
Online shoppers who type “webvan.com” into an Internet browser today will find a website selling more than 45,000 non-perishable grocery items. In the top right-hand corner, it says Webvan is “part of the amazon.com family” and consumers can use their existing Amazon accounts to buy.
“Amazon purchased the name a couple of years ago,” Dahl said. “Maybe they will revive it if sales are slow in the Bay Area.”
12:37 AM

Flipkart raises $200 million amid e-commerce fund drought

Flipkart raises $200 million amid e-commerce fund drought

Investment comes from existing investors Tiger Global, Naspers, Accel Partners and Iconiq Capital 
 
Flipkart changed its business model in February, moving
        from online retail to the marketplace model, where third-party
        sellers sell products to shoppers.
Flipkart changed its business model in February, moving from online retail to the marketplace model, where third-party sellers sell products to shoppers.


Flipkart.com has secured a fresh infusion of $200 million (around Rs.1,200 crore) from existing investors in one of the largest fund-raisings by an Indian online retailer, as it looks to invest more in technology, allay doubts over its business model and pursue a strategy of chasing revenue at the expense of profits.
Depending on how you look at it and who you speak to, the deal is either proof that there is an Indian e-commerce story or a case of investors throwing more money at an existing investment in the hope that it will pay off.
The move sets the stage for a battle between Flipkart and the company it is modelled on, Amazon.com Inc., which launched its India site in June, although it is not clear whether the company has incorporated a subsidiary in India.
The new infusion of funds may make it difficult for rivals such as Myntra, Snapdeal and Jabong to close the gap with Flipkart, experts said. Funding has dried up for smaller e-commerce firms over the past 18 months. Out of the 53 e-commerce companies that raised $853 million in venture capital over the past three years, only 11 companies have managed to raise further rounds, according to a May report by Allegro Capital Advisors, an investment bank.
“It’s a big validation of Flipkart and Indian e-commerce,” chief executive officer Sachin Bansal told reporters on Wednesday. “There have recently been a lot of sceptics in the media and in business circles who have questioned— rightly so—whether e-commerce is healthy and whether Flipkart is running the way it should be, whether it has the right strategy. This event should put those questions to rest.”
Flipkart’s existing investors, private equity firms Tiger Global Management LLC, Accel Partners and Iconiq Capital, and MIH (a part of South African media company Naspers Group) together invested the $200 million in the company.
Bansal refused to comment on Flipkart’s valuation, but repeated an earlier statement that the company would eventually look at an initial public offering (IPO). Flipkart was valued at $850-900 million when it raised $150 million from the same investors last year, according to a person familiar with the matter.
“E-commerce tends to behave in a winner-takes-all fashion the world over. Take Amazon in the US, for instance. Flipkart is a winner in India and this round of funding will help extend its leadership position,” said Rutvik Doshi, an investor with Inventus Capital Partners, a venture capital firm.
“It would be a scary situation for someone competing directly with Flipkart, especially after this funding. Amazon of course has billions of dollars, but the question is: are they willing to pump in money in India? We don’t know yet,” he added.
Although Flipkart will likely need more money—some analysts say within the year—to sustain its growth, the sheer size of the latest fund infusion should give it more time before its needs to sell shares to the public.
“You will see big players like Flipkart, Snapdeal, Jabong raise huge amounts of money. All of them will require anywhere between $200 million and $500 million in capital till they can even think about profitability. Flipkart, too, will need another round of money within a year or two,” said Deepak Srinath, who leads the technology and emerging sectors practice at Allegro Capital.
An IPO will probably be pursued by Flipkart at an “appropriate stage” to provide an exit to investors, said Aashish Bhinde, executive director at Avendus Capital Pvt. Ltd.
India’s online retail market has the potential to grow to as much as $76 billion by 2021 from just $0.6 billion currently, according to a report published by retail consultancy Technopak Advisors Pvt. Ltd this year.
Flipkart was started in 2007 by Sachin Bansal and Binny Bansal—they are not related— as an online bookseller. Since then, it has raised more than $400 million in capital and expanded its product range to electronics, footwear, accessories and apparel, a category in which it expects to be the largest online firm by October.
Both Bansals previously worked at Amazon, which experts say provides the template being followed by Flipkart.
Amazon, launched in 1995, reported its first annual profit only in 2003. As with Amazon then, becoming profitable is not a priority for the company at this stage, Sachin Bansal said.
“If we become profitable, we will be a small profitable company and when the market becomes $76 billion, we will remain a small profitable company, but that is not what is exciting to us. We want to be a market leader and that is what we are playing for,” he said.
Flipkart doesn’t have an option but to scale up its presence at the cost of profits, Allegro’s Srinath said.
“You’re either a dominant leader or you’re dead. You can’t make a switch overnight and forgo growth and suddenly become profitable. The way to play this game is: big money, winner takes all,” he said.
Flipkart changed its business model in February, moving from pure online retail to the marketplace model, in which third parties use its platform to sell products to shoppers.
The marketplace model allows e-commerce companies to save on storage and other inventory-related costs as the products are held by the merchants.
Importantly, companies following the marketplace model get access to foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI is banned in direct online retail.
Sachin Bansal said Flipkart would use the money from its latest fund-raising to scale up its investments in technology and build its supply chain.
He said the company was on course to beating its target of generating $1 billion in gross merchandise value, or the total value of products sold on the site, by 2015.
“In 2011 we set a goal of reaching $1 billion in gross merchandise value by 2015. We are more than halfway there already, and we should be able to reach the target before 2015,” Bansal said.
Some experts still doubt the soundness of Flipkart’s business strategy as well as the attractiveness of Indian e-commerce firms to investors.
Private equity investors are not too enthusiastic about e-commerce in India because they want to see profitable exits before committing large amounts of capital, said Praveen Chakravarty, chief executive (investment banking) at Anand Rathi Financial Services Ltd.
“It’s illogical to compare Amazon and Flipkart. It’s like comparing Sachin Tendulkar and Sunil Gavaskar,” he said, giving the examples of two cricketers from different eras to make his point. “Amazon was founded in a different era. It had a first-mover advantage and hence its investors were ready to wait longer for profitability. For Google there is Google India, for Yahoo there is Yahoo India, what stops Amazon from having Amazon India?”
Going by the June launch of Amazon’s India site, nothing at all. 
12:35 AM

Flipkart closes Flyte MP3 store a year after launch

Flipkart closes Flyte MP3 store a year after launch

Music downloads business in India will not reach scale unless problems such as piracy, easy micro-payments are solved, says official 
 
The company, which launched its Flyte MP3 store in February 2012, will cease digital music sales on 17 June. Photo: Maral Deghati/AFP
The company, which launched its Flyte MP3 store in February 2012, will cease digital music sales on 17 June. Photo: Maral Deghati/AFP
New Delhi: Online retailer Flipkart announced on Wednesday that it was exiting the digital music market in India. The company, which launched its Flyte MP3 store in February 2012, will cease digital music sales on 17 June.
“We set up Flyte MP3 a year back in what was an extremely nascent industry,” said Mekin Maheshwari, head, digital media and payments. “The aim was to bring legal digital content to consumers in India. In a short span of time, we built a massive digital music catalogue at very affordable prices along with a loyal base of nearly 100,000 customers.”
He added: “However, we have realized that the music downloads business in India will not reach scale unless several problem areas such as music piracy and easy micro-payments, etc., are solved in great depth. Which is why, we feel that, at present, it makes sense to take a step back from Flyte MP3s and revisit the digital music market opportunity at a later stage.” The store will continue to sell ebooks.
Users could create a “wallet” on Flyte to purchase songs (which cost as little as Rs.6) without having to enter credit card details. On Wednesday, the company sent out an email to users informing them that the MP3 store “will no longer be operational after June 17, 2013”. The mail went on to tell customers to use their Flyte balance, and confirmed that the unspent money will be refunded.
While purchases will stop on 17 June, users will be able to download any songs they already own until 18 August. Since the songs are DRM (digital rights management)-free, users can download them all to their computers and copy these to their music devices as well.
Earlier this year, at the one-year anniversary of Flyte, Flipkart vice-president, digital, Sameer Nigam, had told Mint that the biggest barrier to adoption lay in the payment process, which he felt needed to be simplified.
Nigam also said that in its first year, Flyte built a catalogue of over five million songs from more than 12,000 music labels around the world, with 2.5 million paid downloads in the first year. Despite the high download numbers, lack of suitable micropayment tools would have definitely been a major issue, which Maheshwari also alluded to.
At the same time, piracy remains a big issue in India and while the Flyte app did allow for the downloading of DRM-free music, things like download management and payments made it no simpler than pirating the content. That’s possibly why so many new services in the music space are focusing on free streaming services supported by ads.
It’s possible that the digital downloads market will pick up again—Apple’s iTunes store is going to help on that front, and some content owners are also experimenting in this space now. For now though, as Maheshwari noted, the market is still too small to support a large-scale enterprise like Flipkart.
 
12:31 AM

Myntra looking to launch online marketplace

Myntra looking to launch online marketplace

Over the long term, Myntra expects to generate 20-25% of its sales from the online marketplace 
 
Myntra is one of the few remaining purely online retailers in India as increasingly such companies are adopting the marketplace model to survive.
Myntra is one of the few remaining purely online retailers in India as increasingly such companies are adopting the marketplace model to survive.

Myntra.com, one of India’s biggest online clothing and footwear retailers, may launch a marketplace platform within a year as it looks to offer products such as boutique fashion brands.
Over the long term, Myntra expects to generate 20-25% of its sales from the online marketplace, where independent merchants will sell products directly to shoppers, chief executive Mukesh Bansal said in an interview.
Myntra is one of the few remaining purely online retailers in India as increasingly such companies are adopting the marketplace model to survive after burning hundreds of millions of dollars of investors’ cash on chasing customers. The business model allows companies to save on inventory related costs and provides them access to foreign direct investment (FDI), which is banned in direct online retail. “Long term, it’ll be a hybrid model that will evolve for online firms. I definitely see us having some component of marketplace model,” Bansal said.
“Small boutiques with quality fashion look interesting for the marketplace. We’ll take one boutique at a time in a careful way so that the customer experience doesn’t suffer,” he said.
In the past 18 months, more than a dozen firms including Amazon.com Inc.’s India business Junglee.com, Infibeam.com, ShopClues.com and Tradus.com launched or converted to the marketplace model. Flipkart.com announced its marketplace entry earlier this month.
“If you were to look at Myntra and if you were to ask a retail consumer, ‘what do you associate it with?’, given the kind of advertising they do, it would be things like apparel, fashion, accessories, etc., rather than things like books or cellphones, which you would associate with someone like Flipkart,” said Ajeet Khurana, a venture capitalist at angel investor group Mumbai Angels.
“In light of this, allowing third parties to sell books on your site is different than allowing third parties to sell apparel on your site.”
Bansal said Myntra will take its time to ramp up its marketplace platform.
“We will be very patient about it and understand everything—it’ll be a five-year journey or longer. If you have a marketplace model where any distributor can get their products listed, they will control pricing, so price clash may happen. For us, there won’t be any overlap. The brand that we have in inventory model, we will not have in marketplace, and vice versa,” he said.
Myntra aims to double its revenue to Rs.800 crore this financial year partly as it gains market share from the exit of some online retailers. The company gets 80% of its sales from clothes and footwear and 20% from accessories such as belts and watches. “If you look at the past 12 months, a lot of companies such as 99labels.com have declined in size. We’re taking full advantage of that. Our repeat customers are also spending more so our revenue per customer will increase significantly,” Bansal said.
Myntra, which has raised more than $70 million from investors including Accel Partners and Tiger Global Management since it launched in 2007, will not need funds for two years, he said.
“Now the big question that investors have is: whether online retailers can become profitable? We strongly believe we will be the first e-commerce player in India on a reasonable scale to achieve profitability. Hopefully, next year, we will break even,” Bansal said.
 
12:30 AM

India Post may tap e-commerce market with its network

India Post’s wide network will help e-tailers reach remote corners of India and reduce their operating costs 
 
India Post charges 6% of the value of a product as delivery cost and levies no extra charges for handling cash or return. Photo: Hindustan Times
India Post charges 6% of the value of a product as delivery cost and levies no extra charges for handling cash or return. 
 
New Delhi: India Post is looking to tap the growing e-commerce market in the country, according to an official at the postal department who did not want to be identified, and will build 20 mechanized warehouses and booking centres that will exclusively handle shipments from e-tailers.
The move will help such companies, many of which are yet to turn profitable, reach remote corners of India—India Post’s 150-year-old network reaches almost all of India’s 640 districts—and also reduce their operating costs.
According to the Internet and Mobile Association of India, the e-commerce market in the country expanded from Rs.8,146 crore in 2007 to Rs.45,000 crore in 2011.
Many e-commerce companies in India have succeeded by getting around the aversion most Indians have to using their credit cards online.
This has entailed offering customers the option of paying cash on delivery and this, combined with the logistical challenges involved in shipping, have prompted at least some companies to build their own delivery networks.
For a typical Indian e-tailer, shipping and delivery costs could account for as much as 6-15% of total product cost, according to Praveen Sinha, co-founder and managing director at Jabong.com.
Sourabh Goyal, head of logistics at Jasper Infotech Pvt. Ltd that runs Snapdeal.com, which started using India Post a few months ago, said the company is currently “testing the model”.
Goyal added that the reach India Post provides is a big advantage for e-commerce companies. Currently, typical e-commerce companies service around 11,000 pin codes across India. India Post reaches almost 25,000.
Most e-commerce transactions are currently restricted to the large cities. Goyal said the 11,000 pin codes account for almost 90% of the company’s transactions. Sinha said the top 30-40 cities account for almost 50% of the company’s sales with the other half being spread out across the rest of the country.
Sinha, whose company has also been experimenting with India Post, admitted that “there were some teething problems initially...., like last-mile tracking of orders.”
To be sure, India Post has to prove its ability to service e-commerce companies. The India Post official cited above said this shouldn’t be a problem.
“A separate platform, which can be built at very little additional cost, will ensure that the shipments reach on time and there is minimum wear and tear,” this person said, adding that India Post also has lots of experience in handling cash, which should benefit e-tailers offering the cash-on-delivery option.
Mint couldn’t immediately ascertain whether India Post will come up with a new price offering for e-tailers using its services or stick to its current so-called value payable post (or VPP) model.
According to a November 2011 report by Avendus Capital called India goes Digital, courier companies charge between Rs.65-Rs.75 for outstation delivery; Rs.35-Rs.45 for handling the cash-on-delivery feature; and an extra Rs.40-Rs.55 for returns.
India Post charges 6% of the value of a product as delivery cost and levies no extra charges for handling cash or return.
The average size of an e-commerce transaction in India for most big e-retailers in the country is around $18-$30 according to Sinha of Jabong.com, which makes the India Post offering cheaper in most cases.
Still, there are people who buy smartphones and laptops from websites and in these cases, the India Post offering will prove much more expensive.